A Doctor Invents A Machine That Helps People Die

This machine could be a big step forward in the field of medically assisted suicide. A doctor invented a revolutionary machine that could help people die in 5 minutes as reported by our Newsweek colleagues in an article People suffering from painful chronic diseases or those who would like to finish could have access to this machine to replace euthanasia already legalized in several European countries.

In the Netherlands, medically assisted suicide has been in the law for 17 years. The law came into force in 2002, making the country one of the pioneers in human euthanasia. It was Philip Nitschke who became the first physician to legally give his patients a lethal injection 22 years ago, in 1996. Euthanasia is still a controversial topic and this doctor is known as one of the most most inescapable supporters of this divisive procedure.



Phillip Nitschke, a supporter of physician-assisted suicide, responds to the sweet nickname "Dr Death". He is also the founder of an organization that promotes voluntary euthanasia Exit International. A true activist for assisted suicide, he is the author of the controversial suicide manual called The Suicide Pill. The debate initially concerned only the terminally ill but spread to another population. Philip Nitschke firmly believes that this procedure could concern everyone who wants to end his life with medical help. His latest invention is Sarco and it is a 3D printable suicide machine that will help people who want to end their lives. This invention aroused curiosity and revived the debate around physician-assisted suicide. The idea behind creation: to democratize the idea of ​​the freedom to choose one's own death.

"We get used to this nickname. Of course, I would rather have a nicer nickname, but then if that were the case, I probably would have had to deal with a happier topic, "said the inventor of Sarco, the machine that helps ease the problem. suicide.

Medically assisted suicide is a subject that creates many controversies. How did you become a real progressive around this debate?

Phillip Nitschke: It has become a real political phenomenon. When I was campaigning to legalize euthanasia in Australia, I was put in contact with a lot of people who wanted to end their lives for reasons that were not necessarily medical reasons. I had met a French woman, an academic, who wanted to die at 80 years old. She was not sick but just thought it was a good age to die. My response was mixed but it made me go back on my idea when she retorted that it was not for me to judge his decision. She's the one who challenged me around the subject, and since then I've been convinced that death should be a freedom for every sane human being.

This opinion is far from unanimous. What is the strongest argument used by your critics?

Phillip Nitschke: The idea that the desire to die results from a psychiatric illness. I am against this opinion. I do not think that the desire for death needs to be treated. Another argument against my cause is that life is a gift but I think that if life is a gift we also have the right to give it.

Do not you take a responsibility because you propose medically assisted suicide and so you make that choice easier?

Philip Nitschke: I think it's wrong. Death is a fundamental freedom. If I saw you ready to kill you, I should not stop you. I believe you are an individual free of choice and able to make that decision. I am only a partisan of a passage to the peaceful and framed death.
Scroll to top